3 ms·
On the other hand the vaccines could be causing more stress on the virus as they generally aren't very good. I'm saying this as someone who had the virus then
by dham 5y ago
On the other hand the vaccines could be causing more stress on the virus as they generally aren't very good. I'm saying this as someone who had the virus then the vaccine.
- wsc981 5y agoNot to mention the vaccines are still experimental (released under Emergence Use Authorization) and might actually have much more side effects as originally thought. And at this point I believe we can’t even be sure on the long term side effects. E.g. a Danish paper stated that in theory the spike protein used in the vaccine could increase chance of developing cancer, though as of yet this wasn’t observed yet in animal tests.
- ethbr0 5y agoI'm putting this delicately, but if we're worried about things that might cause cancer, we might want to look at the past 40 years of novel chemicals approved in household or environmental products. I'm not saying short-term, high-intensity FDA et al. EUA is ironclad, but it's a helluva lot more stringent and reviewed than what the EPA approves (or fails to ban) due to "economic considerations." So, if we're in the worrying mindset, prioritization seems important.
- mahkeiro 5y agoPlease mRNA vaccine are no more under a EUA but a normal authorization since August. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-appr... By the way tons of virus cause cancer, it’s not the case for a single vaccine, so this theory is very hypothetical.