> Security is best when it is uniform So when web traffic is uniformly not encrypted that's more secure than if it is encrypted by varying degrees and implemen

> Security is best when it is uniform So when web traffic is uniformly not encrypted that's more secure than if it is encrypted by varying degrees and implementations? Tbh your complaint reads along the lines of "Perfect is the enemy of good enough". SSL may not be perfect, but it sure as hell is better than running pretty much the whole web in the clear. Particularly as pretty much all of your complaints do not really have anything to do with SSL itself, but rather in how Chrome surfaces a lack of SSL a certificate and how your hoster handles installing certificates. Both of which are things you can personally change something about.