4 ms·
Exactly. I always considered JS Crypto orthogonal to TLS. You still want TLS for authentication and establishing a secure channel to ensure you're getting the r
by morsch 15y ago
Exactly. I always considered JS Crypto orthogonal to TLS. You still want TLS for authentication and establishing a secure channel to ensure you're getting the right code from a person you trust.
Javascript (or generally, client-side) crypto would still be invaluable for other things. If it can be implemented safely, you could do stuff like GPG for mails and OTR for instant messaging. For Javascript, that appears to be a pretty big "if", though. If it can't be implemented safely, well, then it's a matter of opinion. Some will argue the crypto is still useful despite a couple of viable attack scenarios, others will argue that an appearance of securiy is much worse than no security at all.