The article does have a heading "Examples of Implicit Loops", so the author acknowledges that the loops are there, but implicit. I guess "implicit-only-loops co

The article does have a heading "Examples of Implicit Loops", so the author acknowledges that the loops are there, but implicit. I guess "implicit-only-loops code" or "explicit-loop-less code" or whatever isn't as catchy a title, but I don't think anyone reading it expects it to be literally loopless code.