You don't get to propose a suite of projects to negate their costs. Because we're not some hive mind working with singular purpose. So: Last time I checked cat

You don't get to propose a suite of projects to negate their costs. Because we're not some hive mind working with singular purpose. So: Last time I checked cattle used more water and more land than alternative sources of calories. You want us to eat meat, subsidies for cattle then? That's going to produce less calories at greater land and water use. You want to terraform the desert? The word "terraform" is no sweet nothing. Talk about destruction to the environment. My goodness. You want us to use nuclear reactors for energy? I do understand that desire. But you propose to install this in the Sahara? The place with tons of low value land and way too much sun? Might I propose an alternative energy source that is currently beating nuclear at price per watt in CLOUDY areas?