3 ms·
Oh but in J loops exist, they are mostly implicit in the operation. So it is not “loopless” per se, as the sigma notation for summation indicates a loop in a s
by pfortuny 5y ago
Oh but in J loops exist, they are mostly implicit in the operation.
So it is not “loopless” per se, as the sigma notation for summation indicates a loop in a single construct, and it “can be written away” using Einstein’s notation.
That is how it should be understood, imo.