4 ms·
It's saying they are not capable of making a quality contribution without criticism/review. Your reply here is some serious pedantry, you're essentially arguin
by entropicdrifter 5y ago
It's saying they are not capable of making a quality contribution without criticism/review.
Your reply here is some serious pedantry, you're essentially arguing that the output of most programmers is totally disconnected from the abilities of most programmers.
Really, what other relevant external indicators of the abilities of a given programmer does anyone have access to besides the code they output?
- klelatti 5y ago1. Your PR is bug ridden garbage. 2. You don't have the patience, skills or experience to write anything other than bug ridden garbage. Not pedantry at all so see a big distinction between these two statements. In fact almost a textbook study of how to / how not to give feedback.
- OJFord 5y agoThose are both hypothetical statements directed at an author, which nobody here has done or advocated doing. And regarding 2, the original was a general statement about the existence and prevalence of (low) skill; not an indictment against any specific author of 'garbage' who may (or may not) be capable of better.