3 ms·
I don't think F.Brennan (OP) is making any demands here. He's simply commenting on a pattern of forsaking the good for the perfect in a lot of repositories that
by jszymborski 5y ago
I don't think F.Brennan (OP) is making any demands here. He's simply commenting on a pattern of forsaking the good for the perfect in a lot of repositories that, in his opinion, cause them to stagnate.
I see no expectations, or demands in this post. Only disappointment at what OP sees as a missed opportunity.
OP is a pretty prolific contributor to open-source, and I get that ones purview doesn't extend past ones owns projects, but it certainly affords perspective. I hardly think any of the comments in this post are anything OP or any project maintainer should take personally or as undue pressure. It's simply well-trodden commentary [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good
- couchand 5y agoThis isn't about perfect vs. good, though. The PR as initially written was unsound. The maintainers worked to help point out the deficiencies. The author gave up and wrote a blog post rather than finishing it.