Nope. The OP pointed out that the author believes in some very obviously suspect things, which may not make him a reliable source for information on the educati

Nope. The OP pointed out that the author believes in some very obviously suspect things, which may not make him a reliable source for information on the education system (even if the article corresponds perfectly to the "why can't everybody be taught to read by their parents and then learn everything else through autodidacticism like me" viewpoint which is popular here) Ironically, the original article is the one trying to divide people into thoughtless drones that never question the dominant narrative and other people like the author himself. Got to say, that if mindless acceptance of an extraordinary claim made by (checks) a programmer's blog is the sort of critical thinking that can be expected from those too independent for the schooling system, I'll settle for being a mindless drone (PhDs being the most vaccine hesitancy is something of a tangent, though it doesn't really support the contention in the original argument that education breeds only conformity, or say anything about whether people with relevant PhDs' myriad of reasons for being more cautious about novel vaccines has anything to do with the credulity involved in believing vaccines have killed 25k people despite the lack of evidence)