3 ms·
You can't make statements like X invented Y and then add earlier versions of Y weren't Y because they were not as good as X's implementation of Y. That is very
by mayanksinghal 15y ago
You can't make statements like X invented Y and then add earlier versions of Y weren't Y because they were not as good as X's implementation of Y.
That is very much like believing in Flying Spaghetti Monster. It's logically irrefutable, but sounds absurd.
[Edit: Spell]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- nirvana 15y agoYou're knocking down a strawman. Your argument is that the guy who invented the internal combustion engine didn't actually invent it because the guy who invented the piston is the one who invented it.
- mayanksinghal 15y agoXerox is known to be the inventor of GUI. Apple made it popular. There is a difference. It's very much like how Apple invented PC but MS revolutionized and captured the market. I am giving due credit to all parties; you are omitting/trivializing all the conceptualization that went into an earlier concept - the ones that Apple's products were based upon.
- nirvana 15y ago>Xerox is known to be the inventor of GUI. This is a lie that you really shouldn't be perpetuating. This isn't a question of opinion, but of historical fact, an you are telling a falsehood. There's no debating it.