3 ms·
I think this stuff is very silly / trivial, but this - "why does anyone give a shit about it enough to put it on the blockchain" - suggests that blockchains are
by sanderjd 5y ago
I think this stuff is very silly / trivial, but this - "why does anyone give a shit about it enough to put it on the blockchain" - suggests that blockchains are somehow only for serious things (things people "give a shit" about) and I don't at all see why that would be the case.
Where I work, you get "badges" - little icons - that show up on your corporate profile for various things you do, writing some number of lines of some language, attending some training, joining some mailing list, etc. Anyone can make a badge and give it to anyone. It's just a big public (inside the company) database. It's all very silly and trivial and nobody "gives a shit" about these badges. And yet they still exist and people still create new ones.
I don't see any reason throwing this same kind of thing on a public blockchain is any more silly than this.
But maybe the criticism is that (as is often the case in the crypto world) this is being presented / talked about / sold as some kind of next huge serious thing. If that's the criticism, then I'm right there with you. But if the criticism is just "this is pretty silly", well, lots of stuff is, so what.
- cinquemb 5y agoI think because of the nature of cryptocurrency, even in a few of the DAO's im apart of, a lot of this POAP/NFT "silly" stuff gets mixed into pool with talking about return skew of underlying token trading on a dex and its effects on efficient tail risk mitigation when determining how to construct a collateralizaion contract tailored for it "serious" stuff that and passive observers just all this stuff in the same bucket (modulo centralized companies making centralized protocols trying to pitch their shitcoins[POAPS|NFTS|ERC20s] to community calls of decentralized and permissionless protocols/communities as if they are worth something).