3 ms·
None of that is valid excuse for not giving me the option of 300/500/1000 rows.
by quiffledwerg 5y ago
None of that is valid excuse for not giving me the option of 300/500/1000 rows.
- Someone 5y agoCosts are, especially on free sites. Also, giving you more results may decrease performance for others. There’s also the fact that the best UI gives you want you want, not what you say you want. They could have tested this, and have seen that even users who say they want 1000 rows never look past the 100th or often turn away before the longer page is loaded (That’s the kind of analysis that can lead to lazily loading more data/infinite scroll) They also may think they already have site functionality that is better for the use case users say they need 1000 rows for, such as an advanced search facility.