4 ms·
I understand your point but I think it's a bit of an unfair take. If you want good depth in your reviews there are a lot of smaller tech youtubers that do deepe
by belval 5y ago
I understand your point but I think it's a bit of an unfair take. If you want good depth in your reviews there are a lot of smaller tech youtubers that do deeper analysis, but the issue is that most people simply won't watch a 45 minutes review of the Intel i7-12700k that actually goes in depth. On top of that financially they are incentivized to make ~15 minutes videos because the 45 minutes one cost a lot more to make and brings in a similar amount.
> They spend more time polishing the video, studio neatness and thumbnails than informing the public.
To be clear I completely agree with you, but I think it's mostly because the public (or a majority of the public) simply don't care about being informed.
- bserge 5y agoNobody should torture themselves with 45min of video about a processor. Most of the useful information is text and images. Anyone making a video about it should rethink their fucking life.
- systemvoltage 5y agoGood response, I have a bias for the small channels over big production houses. LTT actually does go deeper (provide data and benchmarks), but it’s too overproduced for my taste.