4 ms·
It's not officially supported, but I think it would work if you installed the official ROCm 4.5 packages. The RX 6800 is listed as gfx1030 [1], which has been s
by slavik81 5y ago
It's not officially supported, but I think it would work if you installed the official ROCm 4.5 packages. The RX 6800 is listed as gfx1030 [1], which has been shipping in most libraries since ROCm 4.2. I've heard there were a few bugs, but I've been using it for months without encountering any issues myself.
(I work for AMD on ROCm. All opinions are my own.)
[1]: https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#processors https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#processors
- techdragon 5y agoCan you please emphasise to your management chain how important the need for less terrible support and developer relations vis GitHub is. They can close support questions but basically anything in these repos gets closed as fast as possible even feature requests and other things that should be left open. I doubt they have the funding to meaningfully impact the overall hardware and software support matrix but if they could just make the GitHub repo feel less like I’m back in my days working at a call centre raising tickets to a second level support team in a foreign country who’s only business KPI was tickets closed per day.
- slavik81 5y agoI agree with you. The communication between AMD and the community has been less than ideal. I think it's worth noting, though, it's not always as bad as the example in the sibling comment. The RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm repo catches a lot of questions about big features and the future direction of the project. Those are particularly difficult to answer as an engineer. As much as I'd like to, I can't make a product announcement in a GitHub issue. If you have a specific technical problem and you open an issue on the repo for the corresponding component, you'll probably have a better experience. Some teams are more responsive than others, but that will at least maximize your odds of successful resolution.