3 ms·
AMD is much smaller in comparison, and their main focus with ROCM is to get pytorch and tensorflow to work with enterprise GPUs. Everything else is long tail in
by bubblethink 5y ago
AMD is much smaller in comparison, and their main focus with ROCM is to get pytorch and tensorflow to work with enterprise GPUs. Everything else is long tail in terms of scale.
- vardump 5y agoSadly this is why I (and many others) keep begrudgingly choosing Nvidia cards instead. Once the developers are familiar with CUDA, what are the chances you'd choose ROCm for deployment? Yeah, not great. Consumer cards' ROCm support is strategic.
- enos_feedler 5y agoIf this is the goal they are better off working with Google on MLIR since they are also focusing on hw acceleration of pytorch and tensorflow code
- Gigachad 5y agoThis doesn't mean anything to potential customers. If I was in the market for GPU compute, nvidia is the only real option. AMD has had some PR person commenting on github that they have "big news coming very soon" for navi users but it's been over a year now and still no news.