3 ms·
I'm positive this is usually due to convention, not a conscious design decision. In other words: websites give 20/50/100 row pagination options because other w
by alex_c 5y ago
I'm positive this is usually due to convention, not a conscious design decision. In other words: websites give 20/50/100 row pagination options because other websites give 20/50/100 row pagination options.
There is no meaningful implementation difference between providing 20/50/100 options and 20/50/100/500 options, with 20 as the default in either case.
I would be very surprised if this decision is even discussed for more than 1 minute on most projects, let alone if any user research is done. But I'm happy to be proved wrong!
- oblio 5y agoIf you think that the Google search results page has that number of results per page as a result of cargo culting or tradition or as some sort of random number selection, I have bridge in Brooklyn to sell you :-)
- listenallyall 5y agoGoogle, probably not. Majority of online retailers, alex_c is probably correct. Same with many sites' internal search.