3 ms·
> I think you misunderstood the core issue of my concern. Did I? You yourself said that your complaint about people's knowledge was a "side rant". I didn't car
by user-the-name 5y ago
> I think you misunderstood the core issue of my concern.
Did I? You yourself said that your complaint about people's knowledge was a "side rant". I didn't care about your side rant, I responded on the actual topic.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoI re-read what I wrote. You are right. In my head the two were connected even though it was more of an afterthought and not part of the original argument. I apologize for that. Regarding bio-weapons, assuming we will not end this civilization some other way, I do think that knowledge is a dangerous thing, but how are bio-weapons different from cryptography, 3d printing or nuclear fission. In a more practical sense, do you not think households may end up having gene editing tech in their garage, the way some are mining crypto now? More to the point, establishment is only scared of things that undermine its power. Does that make crypto inherently a bad thing?
- user-the-name 5y ago> do you not think households may end up having gene editing tech in their garage Probably not, if that tech is ridiculously dangerous. We regulate a lot of dangerous things. It is a very good thing that we do. > More to the point, establishment is only scared of things that undermine its power. This is nonsense. This is a libertarian caricature of what "the establishment" is, and not reality.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoIt is possible that we have an issue with common definitions. What do you understand by establishment?