4 ms·
E: your edited in last paragraph is basically what I'm trying to say. > That's true for everything in life as the amount of hours in a day and the amount of da
by ZephyrBlu 5y ago
E: your edited in last paragraph is basically what I'm trying to say.
> That's true for everything in life as the amount of hours in a day and the amount of days in our life is finite so it depends on your priorities where you want to allocate your time
This is exactly my point. I think having decent/passable social skills is very beneficial, but I also know that having an active social life is very time consuming. Maybe OP only needs to do this for a short time to build up some skills he can use in future.
I don't think we disagree, I'm trying to point out the same thing you are. That you can't have it all.
> Where did I say that one is better? My point was that prioritizing one thing (SW career) for multiple years has a consequences of leaving you behind in other things (social contacts and experiences)
I felt it was implied that this was a poor choice compared to being more social. I also agree there are no guarantees. Personally, I'm naturally less social and more interested in my personal growth, so I'm not particularly bothered by not socializing a lot. I think it's very dependent on your personality.