4 ms·
My sincere apologies for getting a little introspective (I'm British)! I did make at least one Mustang and Lightnings - beautiful aircraft all, and rather a lo
by gerdesj 5y ago
My sincere apologies for getting a little introspective (I'm British)! I did make at least one Mustang and Lightnings - beautiful aircraft all, and rather a lot of {B(n): n ∈ (US bomber designations)}. My Enola Gay was pretty decent. I made it with undercart down and with unusual foresight, I used plasticine and a ball bearing to weight the nose behind the cockpit so it sat correctly (bloody tricycle undercarriage - honestly, aero designers have no idea what trials they put modellers through 8)
The ball bearing in question was given to me by a friend in West Germany, whose dad was a ociffer in the Royal Tank Regiment. It was a ball bearing from a Chieftain tank (probably mark I - this was 1976ish). I still have one of the really big BBs from one of those beasts somewhere - it's about 2.5" diameter. This one was about 0.5" so it fitted inside the fuselage.
From memory, I made two Musties. One was nearly all silver with some black upper surfaces and another was the original UK build. I didn't realise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_P-51_Mustang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_P-51_Mustang that it was oriniated from here.
What a cracking gift from our mates over the seas. That aircraft was an absolute belter. Not quite as pretty as a Spitfire (depending on your point of view, but that oval wing shape on the Spit is pretty iconic) but could give an FW 190 a right good kicking with a decent run up. The Mustie had a brilliant cockpit design from day one that started with the canopy - huge visibility. Later Spits and other fighters copied that, I think.
Later on the Lightning (US) and the Mosquitto (UK) showed what happens if you make the fighter a bit bigger and deploy seriously manly weaponry on a platform that has much longer legs. Our Mossies were counted as two kills by the Axis, if they managed to shoot one down.
- HeyLaughingBoy 5y agoThere is so much idiom in this comment. I just... love it!
- gerdesj 5y agoI will confess to playing to the choir! A choir usually sings a more complicated tune or at least more enthusiastically than the rest of the congregation in a church. I'm wittering on about Christianity but I'm pretty sure all religions will have a similar saying. I wish I was more proficient in other languages but I think I am pretty useful in English, which I particularly delight in abusing! That's the thing: you can twiddle around with it and still be intelligible. Twiddle around: It'll work. English (other languages are available) is very, very flexible and that's one of the reasons why it is currently French ... err the lingua franca. English doesn't just borrow words, it actively goes out and steals them. That sounds a bit suspect but I like to think that we also cherish our ill gotten gains.
- dotancohen 5y agoThanks for taking me back three decades. I was building more F-{N} ; 4 <= N <= 104 models but I did have a B-17 in there and a P or two. I don't recall ever doing a Spitfire, but I agree that the plane is absolutely beautiful. The oval planform is iconic, I can picture it perfectly. Thank you.
- gerdesj 5y agoMy pleasure mate. I'd love to get back into model building too but don't for probably the same reasons as you. You didn't mention any of that either but I suspect ... 8) If I ever get back into modelling I'll probably go back into radio controlled flying things. That said, there are a few diorama ideas I have bubbling away too. Now, do I get a Pitts Special up and running ... (probably)