4 ms·

That metadata could be stored in the filename to keep it out of the actual file.

• dylan604 5y ago
  No, the filename is the worst place to put metadata. Nobody can control what will happen to a file name.
  • em3rgent0rdr 5y ago
    well nobody can control what will happen to a file's content either if you want to be pedantic. If are worried about dumb users renaming it...I think most users know to not change things after a '.', so could just put the colorspace code there. And then could put another '.QOI' to end the filename. If want to keep cruft out of the file itself, then putting it in the filename works.
    • dylan604 5y ago
      you're talking apples and kumquats. changing the name of the file (metadata in and of itself) does not affect the file at all. changing the contents of the file will have affects on the file. some changes might not negatively affect the file (like adding metadata when none was present) if the format allows for it. you can know the file will no longer be the same by running a hash on it. name changes will not affect the hash. also, changing the name of a file is not like, uncommon. if it is an image sequence, some people prefer an underscore before the frame number, some prefer a dot, and some even prefer a space. some places have strict file naming policies, and file names will be modified to comply. anyone depending on crucial information to be preserved in a filename is just a Sisyphean effort of control.
      • em3rgent0rdr 5y ago
        the color scheme is not "crucial information". It is just meta-data. It could be contained in the file, or in the filename, or outside the file in a separate metadata file.