4 ms·
Thought it was abandoned but it explains the poor quality of VS and all the constantly resurrecting bugs.
by AtNightWeCode 5y ago
Thought it was abandoned but it explains the poor quality of VS and all the constantly resurrecting bugs.
- pjmlp 5y agoNot more not less of other IDEs.
- AtNightWeCode 5y agoTrue, but then VS is a commercial product and a fairly expensive one. Seems like there are no automatic regression tests at all. Basic functions breaks all the time. Just a very poor quality piece of software for being a software targeting developers.
- pjmlp 5y agoAh you mean like the bugs I hit all the time on commercial IDEs like JetBrains products?
- tester756 5y agoWhat do you mean? I feel like VS' GUI is somewhat decent
- AtNightWeCode 5y agoThe GUI in general is ok. Some features are not accessible by shortcuts though which I reported like a hundred years ago. Along with that, the states of the UI components in VS are sometimes not correct. For instance, the find feature. It changes constantly to Search within open files or. Something nobody ever want to use. The go forward, go back, feature breaks all the time. I do not even understand how to fail to implement this. Or how to break it. It is basically stack. ...
- pierrebai 5y agoIt's scriptable and you can assign shortcut key combo to anything, so... part ofthe blame falls back to you? Do you think VS designers should accommodate your particular needs and desire of a particular shortcut over the needs of all other users who participate in their beta and user feedback and instrumentation data?