4 ms·
Streets/Subways are public, you have no expectation of privacy in public. Consent is implied. If you go into publicly accessible areas you will be on camera. H
by bastardoperator 5y ago
Streets/Subways are public, you have no expectation of privacy in public. Consent is implied. If you go into publicly accessible areas you will be on camera.
However, a professional photographer despite knowing this would have asked for additional consent given the nature and subjects of the photo and their intentions on how the photo will be used.
- _bfhp 5y agoNo one is confused about what the current norm is. The author and other commenters are curious about the arguments for the implications and improvement or replacement of it.
- bastardoperator 5y agoThis has been widely debated for years, photography is nearly 200 years old. Where we have landed is the probably the best place. 1. You have no privacy in public. 2. Individuals have a right to use a camera in public spaces recording whatever their eyes can see. Changing the above would require a modification to the 1st Amendment in the US which makes any argument almost completely moot.
- _bfhp 5y agoI fear we are conflating morality with legality