2 ms·

So when I point out that there are other use cases beyond "replicating an existing financial instrument while trying to avoid the eyes of the state", instead of

by koboll 5y ago

So when I point out that there are other use cases beyond "replicating an existing financial instrument while trying to avoid the eyes of the state", instead of walking back your claim that no other use cases exist, you simply move the goalposts and attack these use cases in other ways. They're all perfectly legitimate complaints. But the fact that you have to resort to them, rather than defending your original claim, shows how weak that claim was.

luhn 5y ago
When someone says "use case" they mean something... useful. I think it's pretty obvious that the OP didn't mean "no one has tried anything with blockchain." I wasn't the one who made that claim anyways, so let me make one: Beyond cryptocurrency, there is no problem that blockchain solves better (simpler, cheaper, more efficient, more practical, etc.) than "traditional" organizations and technology.