4 ms·

All indications point to it coming from a laboratory even if they cannot pinpoint the exact one or 100% prove it. Statistically it's likely it came from the WUH

All indications point to it coming from a laboratory even if they cannot pinpoint the exact one or 100% prove it. Statistically it's likely it came from the WUHAN lab, you know in the town it started. The correlation is too high to be ignored. The NIH has been caught funding gain of function there. So, sure go ahead and dismiss it as conspiracy but at this point you're the one sounding more like a conspiracy theorist by denying the ever growing evidence.

hnaccount141 5y ago
It does indeed seem likely, but the evidence we have at this point is circumstantial. Until we have concrete evidence, stating it as fact is premature.
- CountDrewku 5y ago
  You're most likely not going to get concrete evidence from China. So, we go with the facts we have which all point to a leak in the Wuhan lab. If you have a better theory feel free to posit it. This is how science works, you draw a conclusion based on evidence. If other evidence disproves it then you change. The animal/bat patient zero theory hasn't produced any evidence.
vanusa 5y ago
All indications point to it coming from a laboratory In the same sense that to a Creationist, "all indications point to" the fact that Homo Sapiens first appeared on earth around 6,000 BCE and could not have evolved from other species. And that "evolution" in general is basically a myth fostered by an atheistic academic elite. If it's what you're determined to believe, then hey, it's what you're gonna believe.
- CountDrewku 5y ago
  What in the world are you going on about? That's a pitiful attempt at gaslighting. In this example you're the creationist denying the ever growing evidence. You'd be the one out there calling Darwin a scam artist. There's one of two things going on here: 1. You're ignorant of what's actually going on. 2. You're malicious You can be forgiven for #1 but you really need to take your blinders off and maybe consider some different news sources.

hnaccount141 5y ago

It does indeed seem likely, but the evidence we have at this point is circumstantial. Until we have concrete evidence, stating it as fact is premature.

CountDrewku 5y ago
You're most likely not going to get concrete evidence from China. So, we go with the facts we have which all point to a leak in the Wuhan lab. If you have a better theory feel free to posit it. This is how science works, you draw a conclusion based on evidence. If other evidence disproves it then you change. The animal/bat patient zero theory hasn't produced any evidence.

vanusa 5y ago

All indications point to it coming from a laboratory In the same sense that to a Creationist, "all indications point to" the fact that Homo Sapiens first appeared on earth around 6,000 BCE and could not have evolved from other species. And that "evolution" in general is basically a myth fostered by an atheistic academic elite. If it's what you're determined to believe, then hey, it's what you're gonna believe.

CountDrewku 5y ago
What in the world are you going on about? That's a pitiful attempt at gaslighting. In this example you're the creationist denying the ever growing evidence. You'd be the one out there calling Darwin a scam artist. There's one of two things going on here: 1. You're ignorant of what's actually going on. 2. You're malicious You can be forgiven for #1 but you really need to take your blinders off and maybe consider some different news sources.