> one good thought experiment would be to ask whether a student who graduated from a first tier public research university in 1990 or 2000 received any less of

> one good thought experiment would be to ask whether a student who graduated from a first tier public research university in 1990 or 2000 received any less of an education or formative experience than a student who graduated in 2020. I will say, as someone who went to university during the period you indicate, it was called overpriced and not worth it at that time as well. Your counterfactual is a valid question, but I think it’s also irrelevant. As I said in my last post, the price one pays for any given university can vary wildly from full ride to full sticker price. Your argument seems to be that the sticker price is higher than the median salary in America, and higher than in other countries, therefore it’s overpriced. But again, those who make a median wage in America aren’t paying sticker price for college. I went to the most expensive university in the country at the time and paid 30% sticker price, making it more affordable than the public university down the street. My roommate paid sticker price because he came from a wealth family and didn’t qualify for any support. We both would report that our experiences were formative, yet not overpriced. So you see it’s impossible to make any blanket statements about this. It’s really specific to the individual. Anyway, that’s all I really have to say on the matter. I welcome your reply but I think my opinion is stated exhaustively.