5 ms·
Just to be clear, the state-level effects don’t seem to counteract the local effects based on your link
by ejstronge 5y ago
Just to be clear, the state-level effects don’t seem to counteract the local effects based on your link
- mrep 5y agoI said state and federal: "Considering federal, state, and local funding, almost all states allocate more per-student funding to poor kids than to nonpoor kids, though only a few—Alaska, New Jersey, and Ohio—are highly progressive. A handful—Nevada, Wyoming, and Illinois—are weakly regressive, and the majority have a weakly progressive distribution of funding to poor versus nonpoor students."