3 ms·

This ignores the millions of artifacts in boxes that will almost certainly never see the light if day, and the untold number that the British destroyed while lo

• evgen 5y ago
  The artifacts are catalogued and stored, which is more than can be said when it comes to a lot of older cultures. I would have a lot more sympathy for the arguments that the rapacious British were nothing but a detriment to archaeology and understanding of the past when you could point me to the preservation efforts that existed before the British arrived. There were far worse outcomes in terms of historical preservation than to be colonized by the British (e.g. pity those locations colonized by the Spanish, who actually were as bad as you suggest the British colonizers to be.)
  • uwagar 5y ago
    what is being used is preserved simply by its use. an idol in a hindu temple is sacred and washed and annointed. only when its removed from its context it needs to be preserved. the brits and other colonizers simply take what they want because guns rule.
  • boomboomsubban 5y ago
    >I would have a lot more sympathy for the arguments that the rapacious British were nothing but a detriment to archaeology and understanding of the past when you could point me to the preservation efforts that existed before the British arrived. And I would accept this excuse if they now returned the items they looted to the countries that do have significant preservation efforts in place. Like Greece. Sure the British could have been worse, but they were still pretty bad.
• daemoncoder 5y ago
  And so it goes on: Egyptian temples defaced by early Christians, Palmyra temples destroyed by Isis...