Routinely ignored implies that it's a deliberate action on the part of an employee. I don't think that's the case. The yearly security training gets treated jus

Routinely ignored implies that it's a deliberate action on the part of an employee. I don't think that's the case. The yearly security training gets treated just like the airplane safety briefing. Folks pay attention the first couple of times they encounter it, but when they realize they'll never be in a situation then it gets classified as 'could be useful, but will probably never need.' The yearly security training is probably just a compliance checkbox companies do. If they wanted an educated workforce that practices security first there are other far more effective approaches. Of course, that all ignores the fact that employees are weak links not because they are dumb, but because they don't have an incentive to protect the company when they or their families are put in danger by a threat actor.