3 ms·
1) No, any sanctimony present (and there was none, really) was entirely necessary. 2) I actually made no argument in favor of "fresh restrictions", but that's
by Bud 5y ago
1) No, any sanctimony present (and there was none, really) was entirely necessary.
2) I actually made no argument in favor of "fresh restrictions", but that's a nice straw man you are weaving together, there!
3) I didn't "imply people are selfish". I said it, straight out. GP's stated view is ludicrously selfish and ignorant.
4) After two years of sacrifice? That's just it, though: some people still don't get it, as evidenced by the comment I replied to.
5) Nobody argued for "indefinite social distancing", but, again, great straw man. Similarly, I did not say or imply that these measures are "inconsequential".
6) Excuse me, but as a professional classical singer, I am actually part of the industry that is perhaps the most affected out of any industry out there, or at least, tied for that dubious honor. So I don't need any lectures from you. My entire field was wiped out for about 19 months and is only now starting to limp back.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- BoxOfRain 5y agoAgain, you're just moralising at me rather than answering my points in good faith. You cannot use this forum to deliver a sermon and whinge about getting a lecture back in response. Give me numbers, not platitudes.