3 ms·
> A disgrace for education but a win for educational communism. I was under the impression that (actual) communist educational systems were geared predominantl
by throwvirtever 5y ago
> A disgrace for education but a win for educational communism.
I was under the impression that (actual) communist educational systems were geared predominantly toward the most advanced students, rather than the other way around. Cranking out prizewinning physicists, mathematicians, and chess grand-masters at a somewhat greater than expected rate.
- anthk 5y agoSpivak. Heck, even Yakov Perelman. Recreational Math books that could make American teens cry over themselves.
- thaumasiotes 5y ago"Educational communism" in that it seeks to eliminate inequality (in education) by reducing everyone to zero, just as communism sought to eliminate inequality (in wealth) by reducing everyone to zero. Not "educational communism" in the sense of educational systems modeled on those of communist countries. The analogy is from "if I can't afford a car, then nobody should be allowed to have a car" to "if I can't understand algebra, then nobody should be allowed to learn algebra".
- vntx 5y agoExactly. I have no idea how people can’t differentiate between educational communism and education systems that were implemented in communist states. Was my wording too confusing?
- vntx 5y agoRead my comment again. I made no mention of education systems implemented in communist states. I said educational communism, education where everyone is pulled towards the mean no matter their individual effort or talent.