3 ms·
That's because, during the Renaissance, "copying" something (like a painting) took (almost) as much labor as creating it, so you might as well create new things
by jwatte 15y ago
That's because, during the Renaissance, "copying" something (like a painting) took (almost) as much labor as creating it, so you might as well create new things. What if "copying" a movie cost $100M?
- Natsu 15y ago> What if "copying" a movie cost $100M? Then they'd be worth nothing, because you couldn't distribute them to a large enough audience to recoup your costs.