3 ms·
The flaw in your argument is the failure to consider the possibility that many more works would be available without copyright.
by michaelchisari 15y ago
The flaw in your argument is the failure to consider the possibility that many more works would be available without copyright.
- tzs 15y agoI did not fail to consider that. Please try reading in context. edit: there is no reply link visible to me for the comment below this one, so replying here: The context is that my comment is a reply to another comment. It should be read in the context of that comment. The author of that comment already argued that without copyright, more would be available. I'm pointing out a factor he failed to consider. I'm not making an independent argument, and so do not need to restate things he already covered.
- michaelchisari 15y agoAre there comments of yours in this discussion that I'm not seeing? Please explain the context that I seem to be missing.