>> I just fucking hate the "ohh, you just don't like change" people. > Well, you definitely are complaining about change a lot in a very impassioned way. They

>> I just fucking hate the "ohh, you just don't like change" people. > Well, you definitely are complaining about change a lot in a very impassioned way. They are complaining about people who assumed an irrational reason for their opposition to something, while they have a rational one. I find that kind of assumption condescending ("let me, the rational one, explain to you how to get rid of your insecurities so you can appreciate how right I am") and kind of infuriating too. > I understood that you don’t personally like that libraries change. If you add breaking changes without maintaining the backward-compatible version for a reasonable amount of time, I'd argue your library isn't fit to be a dependency for anything important. I definitely wouldn't use it. The Python package ecosystem may be a mess, but I still manage to use dozens of shared packages daily with quite rare breaking changes, even in libraries that see a lot of developments. I would prefer that we focus on improving API stability for shared libraries, instead of giving up and duplicating dependencies everywhere.