12 ms·
Agree on all points. I had mixed feelings that the fact that the population struggles in the face of poaching despite having no effective natural predators seem
by gimmeThaBeet 5y ago
Agree on all points. I had mixed feelings that the fact that the population struggles in the face of poaching despite having no effective natural predators seems conducive to fostering a controlled population in a closed environment. The food chain wouldn't affect how they proliferate .
But the first thought is always...just the track record. Rabbits, foxes, cats, cane toads, donkeys, camels, goats, pigs. But, like you say, they aren't going to be losing track of their rhinos.
But, arguing conservation as a practical application, has Australia ever intentionally introduced a species for a practical application and had it not go absolutely sideways (big caveat, usually once the animals escaped, or were just turned loose)?
- ehnto 5y agoI had a bit of a dig around and turned up nothing but bad news, so I imagine it almost always goes sideways. The only exceptions are zoos. I did find a small success story in reducing the numbers of invasive Myna birds by volunteer trapping, which is seeing native species return to the areas affected. So that's nice.