This article is full of either errors, or at least misleading statements. It comes across as trying to say something controversial to get attention. Just one

This article is full of either errors, or at least misleading statements. It comes across as trying to say something controversial to get attention. Just one obvious glaring issue with the article: >Note that the app package itself is only 4.4 MB. The rest is all redundant libraries that are already on my system Um, no. It's not redundant. Your system might get updated, replacing the needed libraries with backwards incompatible libraries, and then your app would break. I do agree with the general idea that not limiting possible runtimes to an approved list means essentially infinite runtimes, which can balloon disk space. I think you need choice to prevent stifling innovation. At least at first. But hopefully the community will end up doing the right thing here over time.