> seems kind of obvious that any regulation that requires changing workflows would How was it obvious it would change workflows before his comment? I didn't se

> seems kind of obvious that any regulation that requires changing workflows would How was it obvious it would change workflows before his comment? I didn't see discussion of the relative frequency of this type of action, and instead I saw much suggestion that "shady smelters" were necessarily involved as scrupulous shops wouldn't do this. The commenter's added perspective helped inform mine > it in no way suggests why the changes would be a problem, or would be useless You have no sense of why suddenly complicating the lives of blue collar workers with some regulations punishing a separate action would be met with resistance? I am not sure why this person would have to explicitly write this all out for you, it was obvious to me in first reading. I suggest you interpret other's comments with a bit more charity, you are the one who is not adding to this conversation much more than the one you criticize for such because you are somehow unable to consume context or subtext.