4 ms·
Sure - there’s no need to reply to 90% of recruiter emails (I don’t), but that doesn’t mean people need to talk so dismissively and condescendingly of them “rec
by gonehome 5y ago
Sure - there’s no need to reply to 90% of recruiter emails (I don’t), but that doesn’t mean people need to talk so dismissively and condescendingly of them “recruiter spam” and such.
Just don’t reply and be happy we don’t need to.
- Kalium 5y agoHow else should we discuss the emails and cold calls? Perhaps in terms of how sincere and how hard-working they are or how much effort the recruiters we don't want to talk to put into reaching us? Or should we simply remain silent, tolerating this behavior stoically because being displeased is a cruel status display? I increasingly don't reply, but I'm also aware that greeting outreach with silence is a far cry from kindness. I have trouble believing that this is really the best option. I'm really not sure what to tell my juniors - nobody really wants to hear that being bothered frequently by self-interested parties is just part of the burden of privilege.
- bigwavedave 5y ago> [snip] that doesn’t mean people need to talk so dismissively and condescendingly of them “recruiter spam” and such. What else would you call an unsolicited, undesired, insincere, largely irrelevant, automated message if not "spam"?
- Kalium 5y agoUnsolicited Bulk Recruiting, perhaps?