3 ms·
Also notable: * https://www.clementine-player.org/ https://www.clementine-player.org/ * https://www.strawberrymusicplayer.org/ https://www.strawberrymusicplay
by bovermyer 5y ago
Also notable:
* https://www.clementine-player.org/ https://www.clementine-player.org/
* https://www.strawberrymusicplayer.org/ https://www.strawberrymusicplayer.org/
- zekica 5y agoI'm using clementine from the first version. I kept using Amarok 1.4 after KDE reimagined it in 2.0, and Clementine keeps all the good stuff from the old Amarok.
- bluedays 5y agoThis aesthetic bugs me. I don't know why so many open source apps look like this. I think they are extremely unattractive looking apps.
- apocalyptic0n3 5y agoIn some cases, they're very skinnable and the ugly theme is just the default. Both Winamp and Foobar2000 were extremely popular in the desktop customization community when it was at its height around 2004-2006ish for that reason. It's also because most of these projects don't have dedicated designers working on them. So you end up with the "designed by developers" aesthetic and let's be honest: we developers generally suck at designing UIs.