I read this as "Lush was in trouble due to a whistleblower" and not "Facebook sucks, so Lush quit". Even the article was unclear. I don't consume media often so

I read this as "Lush was in trouble due to a whistleblower" and not "Facebook sucks, so Lush quit". Even the article was unclear. I don't consume media often so this initially scared me that Lush was including toxic products until I concluded it was a Facebook whistleblower, not a Lush one. To clarify: "Lush quits social media due to Facebook's bad impact on society"