3 ms·
Ah fair. I guess I can’t know if the OP was pulling in an assumption that people would be tied to a single monarch, given historical monarchies were based on ph
by gfodor 5y ago
Ah fair. I guess I can’t know if the OP was pulling in an assumption that people would be tied to a single monarch, given historical monarchies were based on physical dominions.
- jimkleiber 5y agoAh yeah, fair point in that with monarchies in physical dominions, one is stuck. How I understood the author's blog posts is that one of benefits he proposes for a networked state is that with a virtual dominion, one could belong to many states at once, almost like having poly/plural citizenship. However, i took that to mean I could be joining many 1-person ultimately rules kingdoms at the same time, perhaps amidst oligarchies and democracies and such.