> You just said there was one canonical length for strings then gave me 4: bytes, code points, grapheme clusters and characters, each of which applies in a diff

> You just said there was one canonical length for strings then gave me 4: bytes, code points, grapheme clusters and characters, each of which applies in a different context. The other things have different labels than "length," which you've already been told. . > Invisible/zero-width characters are not interesting when editing text Well, tell Unicode they're wrong, then, I guess. Have a good day.