> and I don't see how these can be meaningfully discussed by someone who doesn't know what went wrong. The "what went wrong" appears to be an organizational di

> and I don't see how these can be meaningfully discussed by someone who doesn't know what went wrong. The "what went wrong" appears to be an organizational dispute, at least if we're to believe the statement. Moderation team wanted authority over the core team. Core team disagreed. Moderation team resigned. It's not clear that there was a violation, though their intentional vagueness does tend to push the reader to that assumption.