3 ms·
That seems to set up every conversation to fail as people assume past each other rather than double check their interpretation. Good example: the other repliers
by Kye 5y ago
That seems to set up every conversation to fail as people assume past each other rather than double check their interpretation. Good example: the other repliers who assumed ill intent.
- JeremyNT 5y agoWell, I think it's incontrovertible that some people will engage in bad faith conversations with the intent to only further their own agendas. Sadly, there's no simple heuristic to detect this, and once participants are so far down the road of distrust that this question is on the table, it's unlikely to result in a healthy dialogue. Personally, I assume good faith until demonstrated otherwise - repeatedly. What did the Supreme Court say about pornography [0] - "I know it when I see it." [0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-LB-4558 https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-LB-4558