18 ms·
US lawmakers can't even take on robocallers and spammers, so I don't have much faith in their ability. When they are willing to actually impose harsh criminal l
by encryptluks2 5y ago
US lawmakers can't even take on robocallers and spammers, so I don't have much faith in their ability. When they are willing to actually impose harsh criminal liability on companies and employees like they do for citizens, then things like this won't be an issue.
- criddell 5y agoI had great hope when I heard about the STIR/SHAKEN protocol [1]. It's been in effect for five months now and I think I get more spam calls than ever before. [1]: https://www.fcc.gov/call-authentication https://www.fcc.gov/call-authentication
- encryptluks2 5y agoSame here. I feel like of they'd just label robocallers terrorist and treat them as such, it would be a lot harder to find people willing to take that risk even in foreign countries. Sanctions would go a long way as well in other countries taking it more seriously.
- tatersolid 5y agoFurther watering down the definition of “terrorist” is the last thing anyone sane should suggest. Not unless you really want the governments of 1984 or V for Vendetta to come quickly. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism
- dboreham 5y agoUS lawmakers _are_ the robocallers and spammers.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]