3 ms·
> ...we now have to assume the existence of some kind of insurance with copay, otherwise I don't know how 900 people afford $365k/year in medical costs You jus
by actually_a_dog 5y ago
> ...we now have to assume the existence of some kind of insurance with copay, otherwise I don't know how 900 people afford $365k/year in medical costs
You just hit upon the problem.
> Some families spend thousands of dollars each year to buy orphan drugs, which are drugs that have received a special designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. About 1 in 8 families [with children taking orphan drugs] paid more than $2,000 a year in 2018 – double the percentage who spent that much in 2013.[0]
Put that up against the US median household income of $67.5k (or $46.6k for black households)[1], and you've got yourself a significant expense. Keep in mind, this is only the median income. 8.7% of households make between $15-25k per year[1] and probably can't afford the copays, much less the insurance.
If it's a scenario where it's "take the drug or a kid dies," more than 1/10th of those kids die, absent any outside financial help. And, that would be quite a lot of financial help, too.
Let's not also forget this kid is probably uninsurable, so, they'll have to have group health insurance for the entirre rest of their lives. Better not get fired from your job when you're past 26, kiddo!
---
[0]: https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-notes/big-costs-for-small-patients-rare-diseases-study-finds https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-notes/big-costs-for-small...
[1]: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-273.html https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-27...
- wongarsu 5y agoI absolutely agree, the way health insurance works in the US is completely broken. In a flood insurance it's simple, floods are singular events, if you had insurance at the time of the flood you are covered, if you didn't you are not covered (US flood insurance is broken for different reasons, but that's beside the point). With health that doesn't quite work, any system that allows people to enter and exit health insurance at their leisure is sure to be gamed by people who get insurance only while they have health problems. That leads to insurances having the power to screen and reject people, leading to a whole world of hurt and inequality. The reasonable way to run health insurance is what most European countries do, with various implementations: you get health insurance when you are born, and you can't get out. That way the insurance can actually work as an insurance (averaging out risk), can't be gamed, everyone is covered, and if your work isn't your insurance you have a freer labor market.