4 ms·
> I just find it hard to understand on how you are suppose to see if the group is above the rules or how you can find any possible solutions Perhaps you aren't
by mumblemumble 5y ago
> I just find it hard to understand on how you are suppose to see if the group is above the rules or how you can find any possible solutions
Perhaps you aren't?
This is still an internal Rust team issue; it's not a problem for us, a bunch of randos on the Internet, to solve. Our job is just to gawp from a distance, maybe gossip on Hacker News a bit.
- capableweb 5y agoIt doesn't look like an internal Rust issue when the moderation team disappears while saying "If the Core Team says anything about us/the situation, be careful about trusting it without verifying first" in a very public venue. If they really wanted to keep it internal, it would require even less effort to just remove themselves from the moderation list with a "We resign" message without further detail.
- couchand 5y agoThey didn't send you a personal e-mail. They made a PR changing their team status to "alumni" and included the requisite justification in the PR message.
- cormacrelf 5y agoThat doesn't mean it does not affect anyone outside leadership. It's government, they make decisions that affect participants. There's no such thing as a completely 'inside baseball' issue in government, unless you aren't a citizen. If you don't use Rust at all, you are free to feel like you do not need to think about solutions.
- mumblemumble 5y agoI would argue that it's governance, not government.
- cormacrelf 5y agoIt was a metaphor, for the citizen analogy. There is ultimately very little difference in terms of the shape of these problems.
- mumblemumble 5y agoTrue. But what differences there are, are critical.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- lenkite 5y agoThey also formally published this on Reddit.