4 ms·
No it wasn't, the argument was as silly as it is now, for a non-subjective definition of "silly". 500 years ago science was less mature, and unable to determin
by Chris2048 5y ago
No it wasn't, the argument was as silly as it is now, for a non-subjective definition of "silly".
500 years ago science was less mature, and unable to determine what was objectively silly, and what wasn't.