3 ms·
I much prefer naming technologies with unique names, and acronyms are probably the best way of achieving that. It's much easier to discuss and google than using
by simiones 5y ago
I much prefer naming technologies with unique names, and acronyms are probably the best way of achieving that. It's much easier to discuss and google than using a common word.
Camel is an especially bad example, as there is already an Apache project by the same name, plus the Caml dialect of ML (of which OCaml is a much more popular descendant). Not to mention the animal, the brand of cigarettes, and the prog rock band...
- jimmySixDOF 5y agoCAMEL is also a protocol to let enhanced mobile services use SS7 interfaces as specified by 3GPP for Intelligent Networks (IN)
- Closi 5y agoEh, I prefer naming technologies with a mix of both a unique name and it's purpose, otherwise it all gets too crowded. Personaly I find... Camel = Bad Camel Reverse Proxy = Better But again it's personal taste