3 ms·
> I believe this is also the Unicode recommendation when context doesn't determine a different algorithm to read. Except that emojis are universally two "chara
by zinekeller 5y ago
> I believe this is also the Unicode recommendation when context doesn't determine a different algorithm to read.
Except that emojis are universally two "characters", even those that are encoded as several codepoints. Also, non-composite Korean jamo versus composited jamo.
- garmaine 5y agoLike this: “:)” ? Japanese kana also count as two characters. Which they largely are when romanized, on average. Korean isn’t identical but the information density is approximately the same. Good enough to approximate as such and have a consistent rule.