3 ms·

Not sure whether you just meant that as humorous cynicism, but I think it has more to do with pain experienced by teams working on monoliths and them thinking “

• qaq 5y ago
  It's orders of magnitude easier to architect modular monolith than to build, test, deploy and manage a distributed system (e.g. microservices).
  • ehnto 5y ago
    Well made modularity gets you many of the same benefits as microservices, without any of the deployment complexity. The articles argument about changing architecture and language being difficult seems like a red herring, because you shouldn't want to be changing architecture or language particularly frequently. I'd really wager that you should be building your code to last the full life of the product from the start, with adaptability to changing scope and requirements being delivered by that modularity. You of course don't always know the full scope of the project from day one, so you don't typically build software like you would build a bridge, with a fully holistic plan. But you can totally account for the future when you initial build a monolith.